>>> On Sun, May 6, 2007 at 3:49 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please do post (perhaps just the incremental). People can ignore it if
> they're not interested.
Will do. As long as I am not annoying you guys Ill send updates when they are
signifi
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2007 at 2:57 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Nakajima, Jun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> This sounds good, but when will this get incorporated in the tree?
>>
>> The reason I'm asking is that I've got X64 Vista up on KVM as
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> The following is my kernel side patch series for adding in-kernel APIC logic.
> By default, the code enters "level-0" mode and should be compatible with
> existing userspace. I have a patch series for userspace which enables
> "level-1" mode which I will forward after this
>>> On Thu, May 3, 2007 at 2:57 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This sounds good, but when will this get incorporated in the tree?
>
> The reason I'm asking is that I've got X64 Vista up on KVM as well (with
> patches to EFER and CR8 handling), a
This sounds good, but when will this get incorporated in the tree?
The reason I'm asking is that I've got X64 Vista up on KVM as well (with
patches to EFER and CR8 handling), and I'm wondering if I should hold on
because the code for CR8 handling would be different (and this in-kernel
APIC code w
The following is my kernel side patch series for adding in-kernel APIC logic.
By default, the code enters "level-0" mode and should be compatible with
existing userspace. I have a patch series for userspace which enables
"level-1" mode which I will forward after this one.
I have incorporated most
