Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2] Refactor vcpu creation path.

2007-11-01 Thread Avi Kivity
Hollis Blanchard wrote: > These patches are not simple code movement, and I haven't yet tested them so > I'm just putting them out for comment. > > Basically we're expanding the VCPU creation path to add an "arch" layer > between > main.c and svm/vmx.c. Since there is one call in each direction (m

[kvm-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2] Refactor vcpu creation path.

2007-10-31 Thread Hollis Blanchard
These patches are not simple code movement, and I haven't yet tested them so I'm just putting them out for comment. Basically we're expanding the VCPU creation path to add an "arch" layer between main.c and svm/vmx.c. Since there is one call in each direction (main.c -> svm/vmx.c, svm/vmx.c -> mai