Avi Kivity wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>>
This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better
support live
migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by trapping the UD
exception
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better
>>> support live
>>> migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by trapping the UD
>>> exception that would occur if you used the wrong hypercall
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better support
>> live
>> migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by trapping the UD
>> exception that would occur if you used the wrong hypercall instruction for
>> the
>>
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better support
> live
> migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by trapping the UD
> exception that would occur if you used the wrong hypercall instruction for the
> underlying architecture and repla
This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better support live
migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by trapping the UD
exception that would occur if you used the wrong hypercall instruction for the
underlying architecture and replacing it with the right one lazily.
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better
support
> live
> migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by trapping the
UD
> exception that would occur if you used the wrong hypercall instruction
for the
> underlying architecture and repla
