Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 4:54 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Adds an abstraction to the LAPIC logic so that we can later substitute it
for an in- kernel model.
This is
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 4:54 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Adds an abstraction to the LAPIC logic so that we can later substitute it
for an in- kernel model.
This is overly abstracted. It's not like you can (on real
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Adds an abstraction to the LAPIC logic so that we can later substitute it
for an in-kernel model.
This is overly abstracted. It's not like you can (on real hardware)
wire your own lapic and plug it into the processor. It's well defined,
and there are just three
Adds an abstraction to the LAPIC logic so that we can later substitute it
for an in-kernel model.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/kvm/kvm.h |4 +-
drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c | 19
drivers/kvm/lapic.h| 76 ++