Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 4/5] kvm-lite: "The Unbearable Liteness"

2007-09-05 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 01:42 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > This patch is not for serious application, but makes interesting > reading. Requires Anthony's new hypercall patches. > > Comments: > > 1) asm-offsets are required for lite's switcher/trampoline (lite_switcher.S) >and for guest's asse

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 4/5] kvm-lite: "The Unbearable Liteness"

2007-09-05 Thread Rusty Russell
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 10:47 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 01:42 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > This patch is not for serious application, but makes interesting > > reading. Requires Anthony's new hypercall patches. > > > > Comments: > > > > 1) asm-offsets are required fo

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 4/5] kvm-lite: "The Unbearable Liteness"

2007-09-05 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 02:16 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 10:47 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 01:42 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > This patch is not for serious application, but makes interesting > > > reading. Requires Anthony's new hypercall pa

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 4/5] kvm-lite: "The Unbearable Liteness"

2007-09-05 Thread Avi Kivity
Rusty Russell wrote: > This patch is not for serious application, but makes interesting > reading. Requires Anthony's new hypercall patches. > > Comments: > > 2) Includes proposed "platform_type" extension for boot protocol. May not be >necessary. > 3) kvm/ now contains guest code, so needs t

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 4/5] kvm-lite: "The Unbearable Liteness"

2007-09-05 Thread Avi Kivity
Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> Agreed, but that didn't exist when this patch was made. >> >> ISTR there was some feedback for your patches; were you going to repost? >> > > Avi had suggested that IO delay be set based on query to the kernel but > ATM since no devices are in the kernel, this didn