I think that it would be nicer to implement the p9 transport on top of
virtio instead of directly on top of PCI. I think your PCI transport
would make a pretty nice start of a PCI virtio transport though.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 13:52 -0500, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
From: Latchesar Ionkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds a shared memory transport for a synthetic 9p device for
paravirtualized file system support under KVM/QEMU.
Signed-off-by: Latchesar Ionkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:52:38PM -0500, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
+config NET_9P_PCI
+ depends on NET_9P
+ tristate 9p PCI Shared Memory Transport (Experimental)
shouldn't this depend on CONFIG_PCI?
-
This
On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
This adds a shared memory transport for a synthetic 9p device for
paravirtualized file system support under KVM/QEMU.
Nice driver. I'm hoping we can do a virtio driver using a similar
concept.
+#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_9P 0x5002
On 8/28/07, Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
This adds a shared memory transport for a synthetic 9p device for
paravirtualized file system support under KVM/QEMU.
Nice driver. I'm hoping we can do a virtio driver using a similar
On 8/28/07, Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
This adds a shared memory transport for a synthetic 9p device for
paravirtualized file system support under KVM/QEMU.
Nice driver. I'm hoping we can do a virtio driver using a similar
This adds a shared memory transport for a synthetic 9p device for
paravirtualized file system support under KVM/QEMU.
Nice driver. I'm hoping we can do a virtio driver using a similar
concept.
Yes. I'm looking at the patches from Dor now, it should be pretty
straight forward. The PCI is
