On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 10:36 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> >> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>
> >>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> >>>
> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>
>
> >> Hi Avi,
> >>So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well?
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>>
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Hi Avi,
>> So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well?
>>
>>
> What method do you mean exactly?
>
>
Put
Rusty Russell wrote:
> Whatever way we go, grouping both host and guest support in the same dir
> seems confusing (which is why lguest is moving to arch/i386/lguest/ for
> guest and drivers/lguest/i386/ for host).
That really is funny. Our s39host is just the other way round:
arch/s390/sie for the
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 01:01 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 14:11 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 01:19 +, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:56:16 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Eventually I'd like to see the code in arc
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 14:11 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 01:19 +, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:56:16 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >
> > > Eventually I'd like to see the code in arch/*/kvm. That's probably not
> > > easily doable right now because
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 01:19 +, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:56:16 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > Eventually I'd like to see the code in arch/*/kvm. That's probably not
> > easily doable right now because modules cannot span directories, but
> > once that's solved, we'l
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:56:16 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> Eventually I'd like to see the code in arch/*/kvm. That's probably not
> easily doable right now because modules cannot span directories, but
> once that's solved, we'll do that as this is most consistent with the
> rest of the kernel.
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>>
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Hi Avi,
>> So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well?
>>
>>
> What method do you mean exactly?
>
>
Put
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>
>>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>>
>>>
> Hi Avi,
> So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well?
>
>
>>>
What method do you mean exactly?
>>> Put al
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>
Hi Avi,
So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well?
>>
>>
>>> What method do you mean exactly?
>>>
>> Put all arch-specific files into arch/ia64/kvm as you described in
>> future KVM infrastructu
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>
>>> Hi Avi,
>>> So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well?
>>>
>
>
>> What method do you mean exactly?
>>
> Put all arch-specific files into arch/ia64/kvm as you described in
> future KVM infrastructure.
>
>> The
Carsten Otte wrote:
>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now
>> Linux, Windows guests get stable run and achieve reasonable
>> performance on KVM with Open GFW. But you know, the current KVM only
>> considers x86 platform, and is short of cro
Hi Rusty.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:06:51PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 11:18 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > The whole drivers/kvm/ thing was just a trick to get merged quickly. I
> > think the new layout should be something like
> >
> > virt/kvm/, include/linux/kvm*.h -
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 11:18 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> The whole drivers/kvm/ thing was just a trick to get merged quickly. I
> think the new layout should be something like
>
> virt/kvm/, include/linux/kvm*.h -> common code
> virt/lguest/ -> the other hypervisor
> virt/virtio/ -> shared I/
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Hi Avi,
>> So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well?
>What method do you mean exactly?
Put all arch-specific files into arch/ia64/kvm as you described in
future KVM infrastructure.
>The powerpc people had some patches to make kvm_main arch independent.
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Hi Avi,
> So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well?
What method do you mean exactly?
> But even so, I am still thinking we have to come out a solution for checking
> IA64 code into existing KVM upstream tree , because KVM infrastructure in
> mainline
Hi Avi,
So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well? But even so, I
am still thinking we have to come out a solution for checking IA64 code into
existing KVM upstream tree , because KVM infrastructure in mainline Linux may
been a long way to go. Moreover, we also have no method
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Hi Avi,
> Sound good! But what can we do before the merge? You know, we have to
> spend much effort maintaining our patches with sync with upstream tree. Do
> you have an interim solution or proposal for merging IA64 code? Thanks.
> Xiantao
>
The merge is due
> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now
> Linux, Windows guests get stable run and achieve reasonable performance
> on KVM with Open GFW. But you know, the current KVM only considers x86
> platform, and is short of cross-architecture framewor
Hi Avi,
Sound good! But what can we do before the merge? You know, we have to
spend much effort maintaining our patches with sync with upstream tree. Do you
have an interim solution or proposal for merging IA64 code? Thanks.
Xiantao
-Original Message-
From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now
> Linux, Windows guests get stable run and achieve reasonable performance
> on KVM with Open GFW. But you know, the current KVM only considers x86
> platform, and is short of cross-architectur
[RFC] KVM Source layout Proposal to accommodate new
CPU architecture
Hi,
is this the same layout introduced for the powerpc port ?
Perhaps you should work together ?
Laurent
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now
>
Hi,
is this the same layout introduced for the powerpc port ?
Perhaps you should work together ?
Laurent
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now
> Linux, Windows guests get stable run and achieve reasonable performance
> on KVM w
23 matches
Mail list logo