Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> Earlier it was suggested that we go ahead with emulating Perf Mon Events in
>> exposing it to the guest. The serious limitation in this approach is that we
>> end up exposing only a small number of events to
Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all!
>
> Earlier it was suggested that we go ahead with emulating Perf Mon Events in
> exposing it to the guest. The serious limitation in this approach is that we
> end up exposing only a small number of events to the guest, even though the
> host ha
On Sunday 17 February 2008 03:34:43 am Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Balaji Rao wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Earlier it was suggested that we go ahead with emulating Perf Mon Events
> > in exposing it to the guest. The serious limitation in this approach is
> > that we end up exposing only a small number
Balaji Rao wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Earlier it was suggested that we go ahead with emulating Perf Mon Events in
> exposing it to the guest. The serious limitation in this approach is that we
> end up exposing only a small number of events to the guest, even though the
> host hardware is capable of m
Hi all!
Earlier it was suggested that we go ahead with emulating Perf Mon Events in
exposing it to the guest. The serious limitation in this approach is that we
end up exposing only a small number of events to the guest, even though the
host hardware is capable of much more. The only benefit th