Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:35:34AM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
wrong patch, this was meant to go to the slave PIC, so it will use s->pics[1]
instead of s->pics[0].
Why to the slave pic? Isn't the pit connected to line 0
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:35:34AM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
>Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>
> wrong patch, this was meant to go to the slave PIC, so it will use s->pics[1]
> instead of s->pics[0].
>
>Why to the slave pic? Isn't the pit connected to line 0 of the master?
yes, you are
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
wrong patch, this was meant to go to the slave PIC, so it will use s->pics[1]
instead of s->pics[0].
Why to the slave pic? Isn't the pit connected to line 0 of the master?
also from my tests it might seem that tdf is irrelevant anyway with the new
clock wor
wrong patch, this was meant to go to the slave PIC, so it will use s->pics[1]
instead of s->pics[0].
also from my tests it might seem that tdf is irrelevant anyway with the new
clock work and haven't been able to find a case where enabling it (so
triggering this buggy code path) migh be needed.
a
