Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Sunday 20 April 2008 00:38:32 Liu, Eric E wrote:
Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
Liu, Eric E wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 01:45:34 Liu, Eric E wrote: [...]
Actually... we could have kvmtrace itself insert the metadata, so
there would be no
Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
Liu, Eric E wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 01:45:34 Liu, Eric E wrote: [...]
Actually... we could have kvmtrace itself insert the metadata, so
there would be no chance of it being overwritten in the kernel
buffers. The header could be
Liu, Eric E wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 01:45:34 Liu, Eric E wrote:
[...]
Actually... we could have kvmtrace itself insert the metadata, so
there would be no chance of it being overwritten in the kernel
buffers. The header could be written in tip_open_output(),
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 01:45:34 Liu, Eric E wrote:
Hmm, while we're on the subject, I'm not sure what the best way to
automatically byteswap will be. It probably isn't worth it to convert
all trace data to a standard ordering (which would add overhead to
tracing), but I suppose there
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 01:45:34 Liu, Eric E wrote:
Hmm, while we're on the subject, I'm not sure what the best way to
automatically byteswap will be. It probably isn't worth it to
convert all trace data to a standard ordering (which would add
overhead to
