Avi Kivity wrote: > Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >> According to privious decisions, mmu code should be moved to arch. >> >>> From 43a629932b6babcbf2af75299192c1d77c2393d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 >>> 2001 >> From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> + kvm_arch_set_memory_region(kvm, mem, user_alloc); >> > > But 'old' does not longer exist here. You recalculate it from > kvm->memslots[] but the value is not longer identical to the 'old' > value. > > Suggest changing this code not to rely on 'old' at all; instead > recalculate nr_mmu_pages from kvm->memslots[] each time. That will > make the code more robust, enabling the movement later. Good suggestion! I will introduce a function to handle it. Xiantao ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
