On 2007-09-08, 14:59 GMT, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> The above move by RedHat is a bit confusing... what can Xen do
> that KVM cannot?. In other words, why should anyone even bother
> with Xen with KVM around ??. I've read Xen is "more robust"
> because it has a "one year lead" over KVM. But real
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Fernando Cassia wrote:
>>
>> Point #1:
>>
>> I just wish someone had thought more about the name before selecting
>> "KVM" ... because Sun has been using KVM (the K Virtual Machine) for
>> its Java VM for embedded devices for some time. This just causes
>> confusion on web se
On 9/9/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, don't rub it in. In any case the name can't be changed now, we
> have to live with it.
I just hope this is not one of those "we're not changing it, let THEM change
it!" kind of arguments. :)
Software names change all the time... remember
Farkas Levente wrote:
> On Vas, Szeptember 9, 2007 09:48, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> kvm is too new to have been included in RHEL 5. The enterprise distros
>> have a long lead time where the technology is tested and fixed, they
>> don't pick the latest kernel off kernel.org and ship it the next day
On Vas, Szeptember 9, 2007 09:48, Avi Kivity wrote:
> kvm is too new to have been included in RHEL 5. The enterprise distros
> have a long lead time where the technology is tested and fixed, they
> don't pick the latest kernel off kernel.org and ship it the next day. I
> think RHEL 5 is based on
Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
>
> Point #1:
>
> I just wish someone had thought more about the name before selecting
> "KVM" ... because Sun has been using KVM (the K Virtual Machine) for
> its Java VM for embedded devices for some time. This just causes
> confusion on web searches...
>
> The K Virtu
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 19:01 +0200, Luca wrote:
> On 9/8/07, Fernando Cassia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Point #3: Xen vs KVM... I'm confused
> >
> > The above move by RedHat is a bit confusing... what can Xen do that KVM
> > cannot?. In other words, why should anyone even bother with Xen with K
On 9/8/07, Fernando Cassia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Point #3: Xen vs KVM... I'm confused
>
> The above move by RedHat is a bit confusing... what can Xen do that KVM
> cannot?. In other words, why should anyone even bother with Xen with KVM
> around ??.
Xen is probably more mature, and has more
On 9/8/07, Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> kvm have support to amd virtualization extensions., you your cpu have
> it, you should have no problem to use kvm.
> >
>
That's great!!. The more I read about KVM the
Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my first message to the list, and I've just discovered KVM...
> so please have patience with my (probably stupid and answered in some
> FAQ already ;) questions...
>
> The first question that comes to mind is that the project description
> mentions Intel'
On 9/8/07, Fernando Cassia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is my first message to the list, and I've just discovered KVM... so
> please have patience with my (probably stupid and answered in some FAQ
> already ;) questions...
Yep, it's in the FAQ:
http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/FAQ#head-089ef
Hi,
This is my first message to the list, and I've just discovered KVM... so
please have patience with my (probably stupid and answered in some FAQ
already ;) questions...
The first question that comes to mind is that the project description
mentions Intel's virtualization features...
I don't ha
12 matches
Mail list logo
