Avi Kivity wrote:
> Izik Eidus wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Izik Eidus wrote:
>>>
>> [Yunfeng] Yes, it may not be a recent regression, and it may be a
>> platform related issue.
>> Before we used Harwitch /paxville to do the test, and in a period
>> the installation te
Izik Eidus wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Izik Eidus wrote:
>>
> [Yunfeng] Yes, it may not be a recent regression, and it may be a
> platform related issue.
> Before we used Harwitch /paxville to do the test, and in a period
> the installation test could pass without any
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Dong, Eddie wrote:
>
>> How do u disable TPR? Remove the patch, or just remove the setting?
>>
>>
>
> Just put 'return 0' in cpu_has_tpr_shadow() (or however it is called).
>
>
>
avi, can you please ask from alexeye to test it with this fix?
(some times i had boote
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> How do u disable TPR? Remove the patch, or just remove the setting?
>
Just put 'return 0' in cpu_has_tpr_shadow() (or however it is called).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Izik Eidus
>Sent: 2007年12月6日 19:27
>To: Avi Kivity
>Cc: kvm-devel
>Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel 51727a1..
>,userspace 6a385c9..
>
>Avi
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Izik Eidus wrote:
[Yunfeng] Yes, it may not be a recent regression, and it may be a
platform related issue.
Before we used Harwitch /paxville to do the test, and in a period
the installation test could pass without any problem.
But after we switch
Izik Eidus wrote:
>>>
>>> [Yunfeng] Yes, it may not be a recent regression, and it may be a platform
>>> related issue.
>>> Before we used Harwitch /paxville to do the test, and in a period the
>>> installation test could pass without any problem.
>>> But after we switched the test machine to Dem
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>
>>
>>
One regression:
1. Cannot install 64bit vista guests.
>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?funcÞtail&atid‰3831&aid36905&group_id05
>>> 99
>>>
>>> Internal testing here confirms, but this is n
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>
>>> One regression:
>>> 1. Cannot install 64bit vista guests.
>>>
>>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?funcÞtail&atid‰3831&aid36905&group_id05
>> 99
>>
>> Internal testing here confirms, but this is not a recent regression.
>> When was the last time Vista
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?funcÞtail&atid‰3831&aid36905&group_id05
>> 99
>>
>> Internal testing here confirms, but this is not a recent regression.
>> When was the last time Vista x64 installed reliably for you? (here, it
>> works, but not 100% of the time).
>> One regression:
>> 1. Cannot install 64bit vista guests.
>>
>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?funcÞtail&atid3831&aid36905&group_id05
>99
>>
>
>Internal testing here confirms, but this is not a recent regression.
>When was the last time Vista x64 installed reliably for you? (here, it
>works,
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> This is today's KVM test result against kvm.git
> 51727A110220681F6F43B005D069E28C58F5D151 and kvm-userspace.git
> 6a385c9539f9746d7ff51ef34c064c3eba86448b.
>
> One regression:
> 1. Cannot install 64bit vista guests.
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=deta
Hi, all,
This is today's KVM test result against kvm.git
51727A110220681F6F43B005D069E28C58F5D151 and kvm-userspace.git
6a385c9539f9746d7ff51ef34c064c3eba86448b.
One regression:
1. Cannot install 64bit vista guests.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1836905&group_id=1
13 matches
Mail list logo
