[kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel 81e4400.., userspace 08385e4.. , One new issue

2008-02-25 Thread Zhao, Yunfeng
Hi, all, This is today's KVM test result against kvm.git 81e4400b4df4e597a81c19c1161aa03c73613710 and kvm-userspace.git 08385e49dcff3585f597870af67301d7659a1ecb. One new issue has been found in today's testing: 1. fc5/fc6/rhel5u1 no-acpi up guests can't boot on pae host

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel 81e4400.., userspace 08385e4.. , One new issue

2008-02-25 Thread Yang, Sheng
On Monday 25 February 2008 16:41:25 Zhao, Yunfeng wrote: Hi, all, This is today's KVM test result against kvm.git 81e4400b4df4e597a81c19c1161aa03c73613710 and kvm-userspace.git 08385e49dcff3585f597870af67301d7659a1ecb. One new issue has been found in today's testing: 1. fc5/fc6/rhel5u1

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel 81e4400.., userspace 08385e4.. , One new issue

2008-02-25 Thread Avi Kivity
Yang, Sheng wrote: On Monday 25 February 2008 16:41:25 Zhao, Yunfeng wrote: Hi, all, This is today's KVM test result against kvm.git 81e4400b4df4e597a81c19c1161aa03c73613710 and kvm-userspace.git 08385e49dcff3585f597870af67301d7659a1ecb. One new issue has been found in today's testing:

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel 81e4400.., userspace 08385e4.. , One new issue

2008-02-25 Thread Avi Kivity
Alexander Graf wrote: On Feb 25, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: Yang, Sheng wrote: On Monday 25 February 2008 16:41:25 Zhao, Yunfeng wrote: Hi, all, This is today's KVM test result against kvm.git 81e4400b4df4e597a81c19c1161aa03c73613710 and kvm-userspace.git

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel 81e4400.., userspace 08385e4.. , One new issue

2008-02-25 Thread Alexander Graf
On Feb 25, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: Yang, Sheng wrote: On Monday 25 February 2008 16:41:25 Zhao, Yunfeng wrote: Hi, all, This is today's KVM test result against kvm.git 81e4400b4df4e597a81c19c1161aa03c73613710 and kvm-userspace.git 08385e49dcff3585f597870af67301d7659a1ecb. One

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel 81e4400.., userspace 08385e4.. , One new issue

2008-02-25 Thread Avi Kivity
Alexander Graf wrote: The ebx store was done because of PIC code, which does not allow ebx to get clobbered. If we are not in PIC code, =r contains ebx as GPR though, so the assumption that ebx needs to be restored was wrong then. This new version only enables the store/restore code if

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel 81e4400.., userspace 08385e4.. , One new issue

2008-02-25 Thread Alexander Graf
On Feb 25, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: Alexander Graf wrote: The ebx store was done because of PIC code, which does not allow ebx to get clobbered. If we are not in PIC code, =r contains ebx as GPR though, so the assumption that ebx needs to be restored was wrong then. This

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel 81e4400.., userspace 08385e4.. , One new issue

2008-02-25 Thread Avi Kivity
Alexander Graf wrote: On Feb 25, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: Alexander Graf wrote: The ebx store was done because of PIC code, which does not allow ebx to get clobbered. If we are not in PIC code, =r contains ebx as GPR though, so the assumption that ebx needs to be restored was