Re: [kvm-devel] PV network performance comparison

2007-10-15 Thread Avi Kivity
Zhao Forrest wrote: When running KVM(kvm.rtl) and xen-HVM(xen.um) on the same machine, I feel that the guest OS on top of KVM is much faster responsive than the one on top of xen-HVM. But this test result showed that xen-HVM is more responsive than KVM. Weird. I onced tried KVM-36 and

Re: [kvm-devel] PV network performance comparison

2007-10-14 Thread Zhao Forrest
On 10/12/07, James Dykman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dor, I ran some netperf tests with your PV virtio drivers, along with some Xen PV cases and a few others for comparison. I thought you (and the list) might be interested in the numbers. I am going to start looking for bottlenecks, unless

[kvm-devel] PV network performance comparison

2007-10-11 Thread James Dykman
Dor, I ran some netperf tests with your PV virtio drivers, along with some Xen PV cases and a few others for comparison. I thought you (and the list) might be interested in the numbers. I am going to start looking for bottlenecks, unless you need help with the new hypercall updates. I'll

Re: [kvm-devel] PV network performance comparison

2007-10-11 Thread Dor Laor
James Dykman wrote: Dor, I ran some netperf tests with your PV virtio drivers, along with some Xen PV cases and a few others for comparison. I thought you (and the list) might be interested in the numbers. Thanks for the tests it indeed interesting. Actually except for a small