On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume Thouvenin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2008 20:05:39 +0300
> "Mohammed Gamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> > > > WinXP fails with the patch applied too. Ubuntu 7.10 live CD and
>> > > > FreeDOS don't boot but complain about instruction
On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:33:38 +0300
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > 1) add is storing the result in the wrong register
> >
> > 6486: 66 64 89 3e 72 01 mov%edi,%fs:0x172
> > 648c: 66 be 8d 03 00 00 mov$0x38d,%esi
> > 6492
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 1) add is storing the result in the wrong register
>
> 6486: 66 64 89 3e 72 01 mov%edi,%fs:0x172
> 648c: 66 be 8d 03 00 00 mov$0x38d,%esi
> 6492: 66 c1 e6 04 shl$0x4,%esi
> 6496: 66 b8 98 0a 00 00
Hi Guillaume,
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2008 20:05:39 +0300
> "Mohammed Gamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > > > WinXP fails with the patch applied too. Ubuntu 7.10 live CD and
> > > > > FreeDOS don't boot but complain about instr
On Tue, 6 May 2008 20:05:39 +0300
"Mohammed Gamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > WinXP fails with the patch applied too. Ubuntu 7.10 live CD and
> > > > FreeDOS don't boot but complain about instruction mov 0x11,sreg not
> > > > being emulated.
Mohammed, can you try the patch at the end of
On Tue, 06 May 2008 09:30:44 -0500
Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 8.04 is not a good test-case. 7.10 is what you want to try.
Oh yes you're right. I tried 8.04 because Balaji had problems to
boot it with the patch.
> The good news is, 7.10 appears to work! The bad news is th
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 May 2008 16:29:21 +0300
> > "Mohammed Gamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2008 16:29:21 +0300
> "Mohammed Gamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> WinXP fails to boot with your patch applied too. FWIW, Ubuntu 8.04 has
>>> a fixed vers
On Mon, 5 May 2008 16:29:21 +0300
"Mohammed Gamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > WinXP fails to boot with your patch applied too. FWIW, Ubuntu 8.04 has
> > a fixed version of gfxboot that doesn't do nasty things wi
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WinXP fails to boot with your patch applied too. FWIW, Ubuntu 8.04 has
> a fixed version of gfxboot that doesn't do nasty things with SS on
> privileged mode transitions.
>
WinXP fails with the patch applied too. Ubun
Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> On Sat, 3 May 2008 13:56:56 +0530
> Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> With your patch applied ubuntu 8.04 livecd fails to boot. Not any better
>> with Marcelo's patch on top.
>>
>
> Hi Balaji,
>
> And without the patch, can you boot the ubuntu 8
On Monday 05 May 2008 06:10:08 pm Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> On Sat, 3 May 2008 13:56:56 +0530
>
> Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With your patch applied ubuntu 8.04 livecd fails to boot. Not any better
> > with Marcelo's patch on top.
>
> Hi Balaji,
>
> And without the patch, can you
On Sat, 3 May 2008 13:56:56 +0530
Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With your patch applied ubuntu 8.04 livecd fails to boot. Not any better
> with Marcelo's patch on top.
Hi Balaji,
And without the patch, can you boot the ubuntu 8.04 livecd?
Regards,
Guillaume
-
On Thu, 1 May 2008 16:13:31 -0300
Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code sequence is:
>
> 8235: 66 data16
> 8236: 0f 22 c0mov%eax,%cr0
> 8239: ea 3e 02 00 08 b8 00ljmp $0xb8,$0x800023e
>
> So it switches
On Friday 02 May 2008 12:43:31 am Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
With your patch applied ubuntu 8.04 livecd fails to boot. Not any better
with Marcelo's patch on top.
exception 13 (33)
rax 007f rbx 0080 rcx rdx
rsi 0005a81
Hi Guillaume,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:02:36PM +0200, Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> Hello,
> -hda ~/disk_images/hd_50G.qcow2
> -cdrom /images_iso/openSUSE-10.3-GM-x86_64-mini.iso -boot d -s -m 1024
>
> exception 13 (33)
> rax 0673 rbx 0080 rcx
> rdx
Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Why dst.val is not 0x53e10 ?
>>
>
> I can answer myself to this one:
>
> emulate_2op_SrcB("sal", c->src, c->dst, ctxt->eflags);
>
> does nothing if dst.byte == 0
>
> So next question is the good question...
>
>
>> Why dst.byte is 0 ?
>>
>>
Because dst.by
Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le mardi 29 avril 2008 à 11:41 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit :
>
>> Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This patch should solve the problem observed during protected mode
>>> transitions that appears for example during the installation of
>>> openSuse-
Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's strange because handle_vmentry_failure() is not called. I'm trying
> to see where is the problem, any comments are welcome
>
[ 979.761321] handle_exception: unexpected, vectoring info 0x8306
intr info 0x8b0d
Is the error I'm seeing.
Regar
Le mardi 29 avril 2008 à 19:09 +0200, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
> Le mardi 29 avril 2008 à 11:41 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit :
> > Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This patch should solve the problem observed during protected mode
> > > transitions that appears for example du
Le mardi 29 avril 2008 à 11:41 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit :
> Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch should solve the problem observed during protected mode
> > transitions that appears for example during the installation of
> > openSuse-10.3. Unfortunately there is an issue
Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch should solve the problem observed during protected mode
> transitions that appears for example during the installation of
> openSuse-10.3. Unfortunately there is an issue that crashes
> kvm-userspace. I'm not sure if it's a problem introduced by
Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch should solve the problem observed during protected mode
> transitions that appears for example during the installation of
> openSuse-10.3. Unfortunately there is an issue that crashes
> kvm-userspace. I'm not sure if it's a problem introduced by t
Hello,
This patch should solve the problem observed during protected mode
transitions that appears for example during the installation of
openSuse-10.3. Unfortunately there is an issue that crashes
kvm-userspace. I'm not sure if it's a problem introduced by the
patch or if the patch is good and r
24 matches
Mail list logo
