Avi/Eddie,
I just noticed that the latest commit in lapic2 branch of
kvm-userspace effectively disabled in-kernel apic and ioapic. I don't
suppose it's intended, is it?
Thanks,
Qing
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by
He, Qing wrote:
> Avi/Eddie,
> I just noticed that the latest commit in lapic2 branch of
> kvm-userspace effectively disabled in-kernel apic and ioapic. I don't
> suppose it's intended, is it?
>
>
It was a mistake on my part. I re-did the commit and pushed a new
version (you need to fetc
???
I didn't think the APIC is removed.
Who and which commit?
Eddie
Avi Kivity wrote:
> He, Qing wrote:
>> Avi/Eddie,
>> I just noticed that the latest commit in lapic2 branch of
>> kvm-userspace effectively disabled in-kernel apic and ioapic. I
>> don't suppose it's intended, is it?
>>
>>
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> ???
> I didn't think the APIC is removed.
> Who and which commit?
>
commit 394b6efba95f21d22687743def9aa1a0b7125809
Author: Eddie Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Jul 19 12:12:53 2007 +0300
kvm: rename KVM_CAP_PIC to KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP
had parts of the patch that rem
O, I checked minutes ago (using local mirror), everthing is fine.
I got live migration works for FC5_32 which uses PIC only.
Eddie
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find pro
