On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:13:08AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 12:12 +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> > > BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable)
> > > BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved)
> > > BIOS-e820:
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 12:12 +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> > BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable)
> > BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820: 000e8000 - 0010 (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 18:31:53 Amit Shah wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 12:12:53 Amit Shah wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 January 2008 03:35:48 Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > With kvm-44, I thought my kernel was freezing during boot if I gave it
> > > 1G of RAM. But, it boots fine with 512M.
> > >
>
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 18:31 +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 12:12:53 Amit Shah wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 January 2008 03:35:48 Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > With kvm-44, I thought my kernel was freezing during boot if I gave it
> > > 1G of RAM. But, it boots fine with 512M.
> > >
>
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 12:12:53 Amit Shah wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 03:35:48 Dave Hansen wrote:
> > With kvm-44, I thought my kernel was freezing during boot if I gave it
> > 1G of RAM. But, it boots fine with 512M.
> >
> > So, I instrumented the kernel, and found out that it is just
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 03:35:48 Dave Hansen wrote:
> With kvm-44, I thought my kernel was freezing during boot if I gave it
> 1G of RAM. But, it boots fine with 512M.
>
> So, I instrumented the kernel, and found out that it is just taking a
> long time to memset a 58MB area of memory for mem_m
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 00:46 +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 00:16 +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> >
> >> Dave Hansen wrote:
> >>
> >>> With kvm-44, I thought my kernel was freezing during boot if I gave it
> >>> 1G of RAM. But, it boots fine with 512M.
>
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 00:16 +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
>
>> Dave Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> With kvm-44, I thought my kernel was freezing during boot if I gave it
>>> 1G of RAM. But, it boots fine with 512M.
>>>
>>> So, I instrumented the kernel, and found out that it is just
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 00:16 +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> > With kvm-44, I thought my kernel was freezing during boot if I gave it
> > 1G of RAM. But, it boots fine with 512M.
> >
> > So, I instrumented the kernel, and found out that it is just taking a
> > long time to memset a
Dave Hansen wrote:
> With kvm-44, I thought my kernel was freezing during boot if I gave it
> 1G of RAM. But, it boots fine with 512M.
>
> So, I instrumented the kernel, and found out that it is just taking a
> long time to memset a 58MB area of memory for mem_map[]. It appears to
> be taking a m
With kvm-44, I thought my kernel was freezing during boot if I gave it
1G of RAM. But, it boots fine with 512M.
So, I instrumented the kernel, and found out that it is just taking a
long time to memset a 58MB area of memory for mem_map[]. It appears to
be taking a mmio_exit for every access of e
11 matches
Mail list logo