* Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061115 10:00]:
> Baruch Even wrote:
>
>
> >>My current tree has fixes for most of the problems. I'll look at the clean
> >>targets (why are they necessary for packaging?)
> >>
> >
> >Some of the packages are being built by other computers, I'm building on
>
Baruch Even wrote:
>> My current tree has fixes for most of the problems. I'll look at the clean
>> targets (why are they necessary for
>> packaging?)
>>
>
> Some of the packages are being built by other computers, I'm building on
> my machine only the i386 version and the amd64 is buil
* Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061115 09:50]:
> Baruch Even wrote:
> >Avi,
> >
> >Can you please decide on a normal version number for KVM? I currently
> >use 0.0.2 in order to be able to use later a proper version number, If
> >I'd use 2 now than any other sane version later such as 1.0 will be
Baruch Even wrote:
> Avi,
>
> Can you please decide on a normal version number for KVM? I currently
> use 0.0.2 in order to be able to use later a proper version number, If
> I'd use 2 now than any other sane version later such as 1.0 will be
> lower and I'll have to use a prefix to fix that. It wo
Avi,
Can you please decide on a normal version number for KVM? I currently
use 0.0.2 in order to be able to use later a proper version number, If
I'd use 2 now than any other sane version later such as 1.0 will be
lower and I'll have to use a prefix to fix that. It would be nice if you
could just
