Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-19 Thread Ian Kirk
Ian Kirk wrote: 2.6.24.4-64.fc8PAE noexec=off: Using normal F8 modules qemu-kvm dies in the same way 2. Loading the kernel modules that come with kvm-66 Against 2.6.24.4-64.fc8 it works. 2.6.24.4-64.fc8PAE with kvm-66 module seems to work OK. I guess that solves that little problem?

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-18 Thread Ian Kirk
Avi Kivity wrote: Actually kvm is affected by pae: it enables nx support. Please try (separately) 1. Boot with 'noexec=off' on the host kernel command line 2.6.24.4-64.fc8PAE noexec=off: Using normal F8 modules qemu-kvm dies in the same way 2. Loading the kernel modules that come

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-18 Thread Avi Kivity
Ian Kirk wrote: Avi Kivity wrote: I do this regularly, basically you need to install kernel-devel and that's it. Yes, that is very easy isn't it. Oops to my stupidity. I've got it built and will give it a go tomorrow and report back on each test case. Please don't flame on

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-18 Thread Ian Kirk
Avi Kivity wrote: Yes, that is very easy isn't it. Oops to my stupidity. I've got it built and will give it a go tomorrow and report back on each test case. Please don't flame on kvm-devel, even if the flames are self-directed. Er, OK...

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-18 Thread Chris Lalancette
Ian Kirk wrote: I can't compile them against 2.6.24.4-64.fc8PAE as the module magic name mismatches, and I don't know how to change kernel-devel to know it's PAE. You just need to install kernel-PAE-devel package, and then build against that. Chris Lalancette

[kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Ian Kirk
Hi, I was able to boot and install Soarlis 10 U4 but since upgraded the host, I have issues. Host: Fedora 8 - 2.6.24.4-64.fc8PAE SMP CPU AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ 32 bit Previously: 2.6.24.4-64.fc8 Running the standard F8 KVM kernel drivers, with either 65 or 66

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Alexey Eremenko
KVM-65/66 has some bugs on AMD. I suggest you to degrade to KVM-64 for stability. Other than that, only Solaris-10 32-bit is supposed to work fine, while Solaris 64-bit will need some patches to KVM to work at all. For more info see: http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Guest_Support_Status --

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Ian Kirk
Alexey Eremenko wrote: KVM-65/66 has some bugs on AMD. I suggest you to degrade to KVM-64 for stability. Also crashes (userland kvm-64, kernel F8). It is Solaris 32bit. Does the 32bit host running PAE cause any issues ?

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Avi Kivity
Alexey Eremenko wrote: KVM-65/66 has some bugs on AMD. I suggest you to degrade to KVM-64 for stability. What bugs? Also note Ian (which you don't quote or copy) reports success with kvm-65 userspace on a non-pae kernel. Other than that, only Solaris-10 32-bit is supposed to work fine,

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Avi Kivity
Ian Kirk wrote: Hi, I was able to boot and install Soarlis 10 U4 but since upgraded the host, I have issues. Host: Fedora 8 - 2.6.24.4-64.fc8PAE SMP CPU AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ 32 bit How much memory do you have? If you are blessed with 4GB or more, this is

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Ian Kirk
Avi Kivity wrote: How much memory do you have? If you are blessed with 4GB or more, this is likely a truncation issue. I have 4GB (just upgraded from 1GB), hence running PAE else Linux is only enable to use ~3GB. By mem=2000 I assume you mean on the Host? If so, I might as well drop back to

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Ian Kirk
Avi Kivity wrote: If so, I might as well drop back to non-PAE and get to use 3GB. If it works, this provides a clue as to what goes wrong, and we can fix it. Are these known issues? Can I do anything to help/test which might make it work for other people? Just let us know if it works

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Avi Kivity
Ian Kirk wrote: Avi Kivity wrote: If so, I might as well drop back to non-PAE and get to use 3GB. If it works, this provides a clue as to what goes wrong, and we can fix it. Are these known issues? Can I do anything to help/test which might make it work for other people?

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Avi Kivity
Avi Kivity wrote: Not good. kvm doesn't really care about the host page table layout, I don't see how this can matter. Actually kvm is affected by pae: it enables nx support. Please try (separately) 1. Boot with 'noexec=off' on the host kernel command line 2. Loading the kernel

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Ian Kirk
Avi Kivity wrote: 1. Boot with 'noexec=off' on the host kernel command line 2. Loading the kernel modules that come with kvm-66 I'll have a go at no.2, I have not had much luck compiling the modules within the constraints of a Fedora kernel. No.1 I can do tomorrow when in the same

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Avi Kivity
Ian Kirk wrote: Avi Kivity wrote: 1. Boot with 'noexec=off' on the host kernel command line 2. Loading the kernel modules that come with kvm-66 I'll have a go at no.2, I have not had much luck compiling the modules within the constraints of a Fedora kernel. I do this

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-65/66 bug with Solaris 10 U4 ?

2008-04-17 Thread Ian Kirk
Avi Kivity wrote: I do this regularly, basically you need to install kernel-devel and that's it. Yes, that is very easy isn't it. Oops to my stupidity. I've got it built and will give it a go tomorrow and report back on each test case.