Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased

2007-08-19 Thread Avi Kivity
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote: > Hi,Avi > Do you see any timer issue on Lapic5? > On lapic5 I found that linux guest has a big time lag while running kernel > build. > With network time the time cost is about 450s, but guest timer reports 899s. > > I didn't meet the issue on lapic3. > > No, I didn't. la

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased

2007-08-19 Thread Avi Kivity
Dong, Eddie wrote: > >> - rename 'struct kvm_ioctl_pic' to 'struct kvm_pic_state' >> - rename 'struct kvm_ioctl_ioapic' to 'struct kvm_ioapic_state' >> - rearranged struct kvm_vcpu to reduce changes relative ro master >> >> However, neither lapic4 nor lapic5 will boot Windows XP SP2 >> (ACPI HA

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased

2007-08-18 Thread Dong, Eddie
>- rename 'struct kvm_ioctl_pic' to 'struct kvm_pic_state' >- rename 'struct kvm_ioctl_ioapic' to 'struct kvm_ioapic_state' >- rearranged struct kvm_vcpu to reduce changes relative ro master > >However, neither lapic4 nor lapic5 will boot Windows XP SP2 >(ACPI HAL). >I'll debug the Linux probl

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased

2007-08-16 Thread Zhao, Yunfeng
-- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Kivity >Sent: 2007年8月14日 20:09 >To: Dong, Eddie >Cc: kvm-devel; He, Qing >Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased > >Avi Kivity wrote: >> Dong, Eddie wrote: >>> Avi Kivity wrote: >&g

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased

2007-08-16 Thread Zhao, Yunfeng
Hi, Avi In my testing for lapic5, I can boot Windows guest with UP ACPI HAL. And I cannot boot Windows Guest with SMP ACPI HAL even with enabling smp=1 Thanks Yunfeng >This is now done, containing the following changes: > >- rename 'struct kvm_ioctl_pic' to 'struct kvm_pic_state' >- rename 'struc

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased

2007-08-14 Thread Avi Kivity
Avi Kivity wrote: > Dong, Eddie wrote: >> Avi Kivity wrote: >> >>> lapic3 has been rebased, compile tested, and pushed. note that this >>> does not include the patch-folding work I'd like to do before merging >>> into master. >>> >> Thanks and verified it is fine for RHEL5U, XPSP2, FC5, Win

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased

2007-08-14 Thread Avi Kivity
Dong, Eddie wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >> lapic3 has been rebased, compile tested, and pushed. note that this >> does not include the patch-folding work I'd like to do before merging >> into master. >> >> > Thanks and verified it is fine for RHEL5U, XPSP2, FC5, Win2003. So feel > free t

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased

2007-08-14 Thread Avi Kivity
Dong, Eddie wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >> lapic3 has been rebased, compile tested, and pushed. note that this >> does not include the patch-folding work I'd like to do before merging >> into master. >> >> > Thanks and verified it is fine for RHEL5U, XPSP2, FC5, Win2003. So feel > free t

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased

2007-08-13 Thread Dong, Eddie
Avi Kivity wrote: > lapic3 has been rebased, compile tested, and pushed. note that this > does not include the patch-folding work I'd like to do before merging > into master. > Thanks and verified it is fine for RHEL5U, XPSP2, FC5, Win2003. So feel free to fold the patches and wanna to see merg

[kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased

2007-08-13 Thread Avi Kivity
lapic3 has been rebased, compile tested, and pushed. note that this does not include the patch-folding work I'd like to do before merging into master. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function - This