[kvm-devel] questions

2007-12-17 Thread inflo
hi, in the function kvm_init_msr_list(), when will it be true that (j < i) ? in x86.c the function kvm_arch_init() in x68.c, would it not make sense, to put the call to kvm_mmu_module_init() and kvm_init_msr_list after the 3 checks if kvm is already possible on this machine, or is that

Re: [kvm-devel] questions about ack_intr_on_exit and preemption hooks

2007-07-17 Thread Avi Kivity
Stephane Eranian wrote: > Avi, > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:53:36AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Stephane Eranian wrote: >> >>> Avi, >>> >>> A couple of months back, we had a discussion about PMU virtualization >>> and the difficulty I encountered trying to catch the PMU interrupt >>> ve

Re: [kvm-devel] questions about ack_intr_on_exit and preemption hooks

2007-07-17 Thread Stephane Eranian
Avi, On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:53:36AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > Stephane Eranian wrote: > > Avi, > > > > A couple of months back, we had a discussion about PMU virtualization > > and the difficulty I encountered trying to catch the PMU interrupt > > vector in kvm on VM-exit. KVM does not set ac

Re: [kvm-devel] questions about ack_intr_on_exit and preemption hooks

2007-07-12 Thread Avi Kivity
Stephane Eranian wrote: > Avi, > > A couple of months back, we had a discussion about PMU virtualization > and the difficulty I encountered trying to catch the PMU interrupt > vector in kvm on VM-exit. KVM does not set ack_intr_on_intr. Would > you mind reminding me of the reason for this? > >

Re: [kvm-devel] questions about ack_intr_on_exit and preemption hooks

2007-07-12 Thread Dong, Eddie
Stephane Eranian wrote: > Eddie, > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 08:46:06AM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Avi, >>> >>> A couple of months back, we had a discussion about PMU >>> virtualization and the difficulty I encountered trying to catch the >>> PMU interrupt vector in

Re: [kvm-devel] questions about ack_intr_on_exit and preemption hooks

2007-07-12 Thread Stephane Eranian
Eddie, On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 08:46:06AM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Avi, > > > > A couple of months back, we had a discussion about PMU virtualization > > and the difficulty I encountered trying to catch the PMU interrupt > > vector in kvm on VM-exit. KVM does not s

Re: [kvm-devel] questions about ack_intr_on_exit and preemption hooks

2007-07-12 Thread Dong, Eddie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Avi, > > A couple of months back, we had a discussion about PMU virtualization > and the difficulty I encountered trying to catch the PMU interrupt > vector in kvm on VM-exit. KVM does not set ack_intr_on_intr. Would > you mind reminding me of the reason for this? > > O

[kvm-devel] questions about ack_intr_on_exit and preemption hooks

2007-07-12 Thread Stephane Eranian
Avi, A couple of months back, we had a discussion about PMU virtualization and the difficulty I encountered trying to catch the PMU interrupt vector in kvm on VM-exit. KVM does not set ack_intr_on_intr. Would you mind reminding me of the reason for this? On the topic of scheduler hooks for use by

Re: [kvm-devel] Questions about KVM

2007-04-12 Thread Jon
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 04:44:14PM -0400, Andrey Dmitriev wrote: > A) (more of a comment); Windows 2000 server stalls on "installing > devices", running with > kvm -had vdisk.win2k -m 256 -cdrom win2k.iso -no-kvm (a restart of a > previously hung setup) I would suggest installing win2k with kqe

[kvm-devel] Questions about KVM

2007-04-12 Thread Andrey Dmitriev
Info: running latest debian (kvm-modules-2.6.18-4-amd64) A) (more of a comment); Windows 2000 server stalls on "installing devices", running with kvm -had vdisk.win2k -m 256 -cdrom win2k.iso -no-kvm (a restart of a previously hung setup) B) if Win2K worked, is there are a (easy) way to xfer my