Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 20:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>>
>>> Avi, what do you think about breaking the kvm-userspace repository into
>>> separate kvm-qemu, kvmctl, and libkvm repositories?
>>>
>> Firstly, I think kvmctl and libkvm
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 20:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > Avi, what do you think about breaking the kvm-userspace repository into
> > separate kvm-qemu, kvmctl, and libkvm repositories?
>
> Firstly, I think kvmctl and libkvm should stay together.
Why? As far as I can see,
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Avi, what do you think about breaking the kvm-userspace repository into
> separate kvm-qemu, kvmctl, and libkvm repositories?
>
>
Firstly, I think kvmctl and libkvm should stay together.
I'm not thrilled about breaking up the repositories even more; it makes
bisectin
Avi, what do you think about breaking the kvm-userspace repository into
separate kvm-qemu, kvmctl, and libkvm repositories?
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
St
