Re: [kvm-devel] lapic2 branch

2007-08-01 Thread Dor Laor
ED] >>Sent: 2007年7月31日 3:10 >>To: Zhao, Yunfeng; kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Dong, Eddie; He, >Qing >>Subject: RE: [kvm-devel] lapic2 branch >> >>>What fedora distribution is in the guest? >>>Could you give more detailed config info? >>>Be

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic2 branch

2007-08-01 Thread Zhao, Yunfeng
r Laor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 2007年7月31日 3:10 >To: Zhao, Yunfeng; kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Dong, Eddie; He, Qing >Subject: RE: [kvm-devel] lapic2 branch > >>What fedora distribution is in the guest? >>Could you give more detailed config info? >>Before I

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic2 branch rebased

2007-07-31 Thread Avi Kivity
Dong, Eddie wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >> I rebased the lapic2 branch onto current master. Because there were >> many nontrivial changes, the result is in a new branch, >> lapic3. This is >> for both kernel and userspace. >> >> > > lapic3 clearly crashes after the rebase due to APIC reg

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic2 branch rebased

2007-07-31 Thread Dong, Eddie
Avi Kivity wrote: > I rebased the lapic2 branch onto current master. Because there were > many nontrivial changes, the result is in a new branch, > lapic3. This is > for both kernel and userspace. > lapic3 clearly crashes after the rebase due to APIC register access earlier than APIC instan

Re: [kvm-devel] lapic2 branch

2007-07-31 Thread Zhao, Yunfeng
What fedora distribution is in the guest? Could you give more detailed config info? Before I tried to boot 64bit RHEL4U3 against lapic2 branch, I didn't meet the problem. Thanks Yunfeng >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dor Laor >Sent: