Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> Hi,Avi
> Do you see any timer issue on Lapic5?
> On lapic5 I found that linux guest has a big time lag while running kernel
> build.
> With network time the time cost is about 450s, but guest timer reports 899s.
>
> I didn't meet the issue on lapic3.
>
>
No, I didn't. la
Dong, Eddie wrote:
>
>> - rename 'struct kvm_ioctl_pic' to 'struct kvm_pic_state'
>> - rename 'struct kvm_ioctl_ioapic' to 'struct kvm_ioapic_state'
>> - rearranged struct kvm_vcpu to reduce changes relative ro master
>>
>> However, neither lapic4 nor lapic5 will boot Windows XP SP2
>> (ACPI HA
>- rename 'struct kvm_ioctl_pic' to 'struct kvm_pic_state'
>- rename 'struct kvm_ioctl_ioapic' to 'struct kvm_ioapic_state'
>- rearranged struct kvm_vcpu to reduce changes relative ro master
>
>However, neither lapic4 nor lapic5 will boot Windows XP SP2
>(ACPI HAL).
>I'll debug the Linux probl
--
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Kivity
>Sent: 2007年8月14日 20:09
>To: Dong, Eddie
>Cc: kvm-devel; He, Qing
>Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] lapic3 branch rebased
>
>Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Dong, Eddie wrote:
>>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>&g
Hi, Avi
In my testing for lapic5, I can boot Windows guest with UP ACPI HAL.
And I cannot boot Windows Guest with SMP ACPI HAL even with enabling
smp=1
Thanks
Yunfeng
>This is now done, containing the following changes:
>
>- rename 'struct kvm_ioctl_pic' to 'struct kvm_pic_state'
>- rename 'struc
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Dong, Eddie wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> lapic3 has been rebased, compile tested, and pushed. note that this
>>> does not include the patch-folding work I'd like to do before merging
>>> into master.
>>>
>> Thanks and verified it is fine for RHEL5U, XPSP2, FC5, Win
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> lapic3 has been rebased, compile tested, and pushed. note that this
>> does not include the patch-folding work I'd like to do before merging
>> into master.
>>
>>
> Thanks and verified it is fine for RHEL5U, XPSP2, FC5, Win2003. So feel
> free t
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> lapic3 has been rebased, compile tested, and pushed. note that this
>> does not include the patch-folding work I'd like to do before merging
>> into master.
>>
>>
> Thanks and verified it is fine for RHEL5U, XPSP2, FC5, Win2003. So feel
> free t
Avi Kivity wrote:
> lapic3 has been rebased, compile tested, and pushed. note that this
> does not include the patch-folding work I'd like to do before merging
> into master.
>
Thanks and verified it is fine for RHEL5U, XPSP2, FC5, Win2003. So feel
free to
fold the patches and wanna to see merg
