On 09.02.2010, at 13:27, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/09/2010 01:13 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/09/2010 01:00 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
> That's pretty impressive (never saw x86 with this exit rate) but it's
> more than 1000 times slowe
On 02/17/2010 04:56 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
So I changed to code according to your input by making all FPU calls explicit,
getting rid of all binary patching.
On the PowerStation again I'm running this code (simplified to the important
instructions) using kvmctl:
li r2, 0x123
On 17.02.2010, at 17:03, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/17/2010 04:56 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> So I changed to code according to your input by making all FPU calls
>> explicit, getting rid of all binary patching.
>>
>> On the PowerStation again I'm running this code (simplified to the import
On 02/17/2010 06:23 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.02.2010, at 17:03, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/17/2010 04:56 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
So I changed to code according to your input by making all FPU calls explicit,
getting rid of all binary patching.
On the PowerStation again I'm ru
On 17.02.2010, at 17:34, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/17/2010 06:23 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 17.02.2010, at 17:03, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 02/17/2010 04:56 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
So I changed to code according to your input by making all FPU calls
explicit, g
On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.02.2010, at 17:34, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/17/2010 06:23 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.02.2010, at 17:03, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/17/2010 04:56 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
So I changed to code according to you
