On 05.08.2010, at 09:57, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/03/2010 07:16 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 22:21:37 +0200
Alexander Grafag...@suse.de wrote:
On 01.08.2010, at 16:02, Avi Kivity wrote:
Looks reasonable. Since it's fair to say I understand nothing about
powerpc, I'd like
On 08/05/2010 11:01 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Shall I take this as an ACK?
Hollis wanted to take a look at it too. But given the fact that I have another
~10 patches lying here I'd appreciate if things could get committed. If changes
are so dramatic that they'd render things incompatible,
On 07/29/2010 03:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On PPC we run PR=0 (kernel mode) code in PR=1 (user mode) and don't use the
hypervisor extensions.
While that is all great to show that virtualization is possible, there are
quite some cases where the emulation overhead of privileged instructions
On 07/29/2010 05:47 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
We will soon start and replace instructions from the text section with
other, paravirtualized versions. To ease the readability of those patches
I split out the generic looping and magic page mapping code out.
This patch still only contains stubs.
On 07/29/2010 05:47 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
For transparent variable sharing between the hypervisor and guest, I introduce
a shared page. This shared page will contain all the registers the guest can
read and write safely without exiting guest context.
This patch only implements the stubs
