On 02/20/2013 01:58:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
This is probably a stupid question, but why the
KVM_SET_IRQCHIP/KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING interface is not appropriate for
your purposes?
x86 sets up a default GSI-IRQCHIP PIN mapping on creation (during
KVM_SET_IRQCHIP), but it can be modified with
On 02/20/2013 06:01:00 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
The main problem, to me, is that the interface allows flexibility but
the details of using such flexibility are not worked out.
That is, lack of definitions such as when setting attributes is
allowed.
That is defined by the individual
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:20:51PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On 02/20/2013 01:58:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
This is probably a stupid question, but why the
KVM_SET_IRQCHIP/KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING interface is not appropriate for
your purposes?
x86 sets up a default GSI-IRQCHIP PIN mapping on
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:53:20PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
Why exactly you need to set attributes Scott?
That's best answered by looking at patch 6/6 and discussing the
actual attributes that are defined so far.
The need to set the base address of the registers is
straightforward. When
On 02/20/2013 07:09:55 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:20:51PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On 02/20/2013 01:58:54 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
This is probably a stupid question, but why the
KVM_SET_IRQCHIP/KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING interface is not appropriate
for
your
On 02/20/2013 07:09:49 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:16:37PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On 02/19/2013 06:24:18 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 05:01:40PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
The ability to set/get attributes is needed. Sorry, but get or
set
one
