On 02/07/2014 11:04 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 04:39 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 06.02.2014, at 17:36, Greg Kurz wrote:
>>
>>> As discussed in this thread:
>>>
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/309166/
>>>
>>> We need some consistency in the way we check whether the
On 02/07/2014 04:39 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 06.02.2014, at 17:36, Greg Kurz wrote:
>
>> As discussed in this thread:
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/309166/
>>
>> We need some consistency in the way we check whether the guest
>> should resume or not because:
>> - new RESUME_GUES
On 06.02.2014, at 17:36, Greg Kurz wrote:
> As discussed in this thread:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/309166/
>
> We need some consistency in the way we check whether the guest
> should resume or not because:
> - new RESUME_GUEST_XXX values may show up
> - more locations in KVM may ne
Let's use a helper for this, in case new RESUME_GUEST_XXX values
are introduced.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index d62dc6c..85df6a4 100
There are some locations where we check if the return value of a service
indicates that we should resume the guest. This patch introduces a helper
to handle the two possible values we currently have:
- RESUME_GUEST
- RESUME_GUEST_NV
Since it only affects Book3S HV for now, the helper is added to
t
As discussed in this thread:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/309166/
We need some consistency in the way we check whether the guest
should resume or not because:
- new RESUME_GUEST_XXX values may show up
- more locations in KVM may need to perform a similar check
This serie introduces a helper
Let's use a helper for this, in case new RESUME_GUEST_XXX values
are introduced.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 85df6a4..3b498d9 100
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
When write to MMIO happens and there is an ioeventfd for that and
is handled successfully, ioeventfd_write() returns 0 (success) and
kvmppc_handle_store() returns EMULATE_DONE. Then kvmppc_emulate_mmio()
converts EMULATE_DONE to RESUME_GUEST_NV and this broke from the l
On 28.01.2014, at 07:39, Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
> Although it's optional IBM POWER cpus always had DAR value set on
> alignment interrupt. So don't try to compute these values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> ---
> Changes from V2:
> * Depend on cpu feature flag to decide whether to us
On 28.01.2014, at 07:46, Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
> This patch make sure we inherit the LE bit correctly in different case
> so that we can run Little Endian distro in PR mode
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> ---
> Changes from V2:
> * Move H_SET_MODE to qemu
>
>
> arch/powerpc/include/
10 matches
Mail list logo