On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 05:46:11PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> We use time base for PURR and SPURR emulation with PR KVM since we
> are emulating a single threaded core. When using time base
> we need to make sure that we don't accumulate time spent in the host
> in PURR and SPURR value.
Most
We use time base for PURR and SPURR emulation with PR KVM since we
are emulating a single threaded core. When using time base
we need to make sure that we don't accumulate time spent in the host
in PURR and SPURR value.
Also we don't need to emulate mtspr because both the registers are
hypervisor
Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz
Acked-by: Pao
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 09:45 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> For EEH it could as well be a dumb eventfd - really just a side
> channel that can tell user space that something happened
> asynchronously :).
Which the host kernel may have no way to detect without actively poking
at the device (fences i
> Am 03.06.2014 um 07:54 schrieb Paul Mackerras :
>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 01:25:11PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>> On 20.05.14 10:30, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> If we detects frozen state on PE that has been passed to guest, we
>>> needn't handle it. Instead, we rely on the guest to detec
On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz
--
Best regards, _
On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-contiguous.h b/include/linux/d
