On 01.08.14 06:50, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
This patch adds kernel side support for software breakpoint.
Design is that, by using an illegal instruction, we trap to hypervisor
via Emulation Assistance interrupt, where we check for the illegal instruction
and accordingly we return to Host or
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 09:26 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
index da86d9b..d95014e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
This should be book3s_emulate.c.
Any reason we can't make that
On 11.08.14 10:51, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 09:26 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
index da86d9b..d95014e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
This should be
On 06.08.14 18:33, Mihai Caraman wrote:
ePAPR represents hardware threads as cpu node properties in device tree.
So with existing QEMU, hardware threads are simply exposed as vcpus with
one hardware thread.
The e6500 core shares TLBs between hardware threads. Without tlb write
conditional
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 11:39 +0300, Mihai Caraman wrote:
SPE exception handlers are now defined for 32-bit e500mc cores even though
SPE unit is not present and CONFIG_SPE is undefined.
Restrict SPE exception handlers to e200/e500 cores adding CONFIG_SPE_POSSIBLE
and consequently guard
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 19:33 +0300, Mihai Caraman wrote:
@@ -390,19 +400,30 @@ static void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free_e500mc(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int kvmppc_core_init_vm_e500mc(struct kvm *kvm)
{
- int lpid;
+ int i, lpid;
- lpid = kvmppc_alloc_lpid();
- if
Am 12.08.2014 um 01:36 schrieb Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com:
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 19:33 +0300, Mihai Caraman wrote:
@@ -390,19 +400,30 @@ static void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free_e500mc(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int kvmppc_core_init_vm_e500mc(struct kvm *kvm)
{
-int lpid;
+
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 01:53 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 12.08.2014 um 01:36 schrieb Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com:
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 19:33 +0300, Mihai Caraman wrote:
@@ -390,19 +400,30 @@ static void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free_e500mc(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 12:08 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
@@ -1249,6 +1284,7 @@ int kvmppc_subarch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
setup_timer(vcpu-arch.wdt_timer, kvmppc_watchdog_func,
(unsigned long)vcpu);
+ kvmppc_clear_dbsr();
return 0;
This could use
