On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:53 AM, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> Hi Kumar/Benh,
>
> After further looking into the code I think that if we correct the vector
> range below in DebugDebug handler then we do not need the change I provided
> in this patch.
>
> Here is the snapshot for 32 bit (head_book
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> From: Stuart Yoder
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder
> ---
>
> -removed KVM prefix to patch subject, patch is not KVM specific
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_hcalls.S |2 ++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3e.S | 32
On Aug 4, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
>> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 10:04 PM
>> To: Sethi Varun-B16395
>> Cc: ag...@suse.de; b...@kernel.crashing.org
On Jul 9, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Varun Sethi wrote:
> For the 64 bit case separate out e5500 cpu_setup and cpu_restore functions.
> The cpu_setup function (for the primary core) is passed the cpu_spec pointer,
> which is not there in case of the cpu_restore function. Also, in our case
> we will have t
On Jul 9, 2012, at 7:58 AM, Varun Sethi wrote:
> Merge the 32 bit cpu setup code for e500mc/e5500 and define the "cpu_restore"
> routine (for e5500/e6500) only for the 64 bit case. The cpu_restore routine
> is used in the 64 bit case for setting up the secondary cores.
>
> Signed-off-by: Varun S
On Jul 9, 2012, at 7:55 AM, Varun Sethi wrote:
> Move the E.HV check and CPU_FTR_EMB_HV flag manipulation to the cpu setup
> code.
> Create a separate routine for E.HV ivors setup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_fsl_booke.S | 29 +
On Jul 9, 2012, at 8:04 AM, Varun Sethi wrote:
> Added CPU_FTR_EMB_HV feature check for e550.
>
> Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi
> Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_fsl_booke.S |6 ++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
[ fixed typo e550 -> e
On Feb 29, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Olivia Yin wrote:
> From: Liu Yu
>
> So that we can call it when improving SPE switch like book3e did for fp
> switch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yu
> Signed-off-by: Olivia Yin
> ---
> v2: add Signed-off-by
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S | 23 ++--
c support") collided during merge, leaving e6500's CPU
> table entry missing CPU_FTR_EMB_HV.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
> ---
> Fixup patch for the KVM merge as requested by Marcelo.
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 in
On Mar 21, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 01:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>> From: Scott Wood
>>>
>>> DO_KVM will need to identify the particular exception type
booke.S |6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Kumar Gala
[ Alex, let me know if you want this via my powerpc.git tree or your kvm tree ]
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to ma
booke.S |2 --
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c|1 +
> arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c |5 +----
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Kumar Gala
[ Alex, let me know if you want this via my powerpc.git tree or your kvm tree ]
- k--
To unsubscr
On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> This allows reuse for saving/restoring KVM SPE state.
Can you update commit comment to include a little about how we accomplish that.
(something about the macro change is all I'm looking for)
[otherwise ACK]
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
> -
On Aug 22, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Michael Neuling wrote:
>> Neither lfs nor stfs touch the fpscr, so remove the restore/save of it
>> around them.
>
> Do some 32 bit processors need this?
>
> In 32 bit before the merge, we use to have code that did:
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_E
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> [without]
>
> debian-powerpc:~# time for i in {1..1000}; do /bin/echo hello > /dev/null;
> done
>
> real0m14.659s
> user0m8.967s
> sys 0m5.688s
>
> [with]
>
> debian-powerpc:~# time for i in {1..1000}; do /bin/echo hello > /dev
Should 'info registers' work?
I'm getting a segfault:
(qemu) info registers
NIP c000ca38 LR c040290c CTR c004a290 XER 2000
MSR 00029002 HID0 HF idx 1
Segmentation fault
This is w/top of qemu. I'm trying to use the mpc8544 target.
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-fsl-booke.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-fsl-booke.h
@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+extern unsigned int tlbcam_index;
+
typedef struct {
unsigned long id;
unsigned long vdso_base;
--
1.5.4
Acked-by: Kumar Gala
(Hollis will you deal
I'll pick this up, but wondering about this patch vs Trent's changes
to remove this.
How is KVM on fsl-booke using this value?
- k
On Jan 4, 2009, at 12:57 AM, Liu Yu wrote:
Hi Kumar,
Can I get your ack?
So that I can submit this patch through KVM tree.
-Original Message-
From:
On Oct 13, 2008, at 12:29 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 11:42 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
+
+/* Hypercalls use the beat ABI */
+#define KVM_HYPERCALL_BIN 0x4422
Any reason this isn't 'sc' ?
Also, can we make this "sc 1" so its works when we h
On Sep 16, 2008, at 1:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This adds the guest portion of the hypercall infrastructure.
Version 3 now follows the beat ABI, but proposes a new
implementation style as
static inline asm functions instead of pure assemble
On Aug 19, 2008, at 5:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This adds the guest portion of the hypercall infrastructure,
basically an
illegal instruction with a defined layout.
See http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/PowerPC_Hypercall_ABI for more
detail
On Aug 22, 2008, at 3:08 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:21:39AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Where is the other discussion? I'd like to understand what's
going on here.. (especially since I added the wrtee[i] changes to
kernel way
On Aug 21, 2008, at 9:13 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 19, 2008, at 5:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dependent on the already existing CONFIG_KVM_GUEST config option
this patch
changes wrteei to wrtee allowi
On Aug 19, 2008, at 5:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dependent on the already existing CONFIG_KVM_GUEST config option
this patch
changes wrteei to wrtee allowing the hypervisor to rewrite those to
nontrapping
instructions. Maybe we should split
24 matches
Mail list logo
