On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 06:31 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:37:43 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 18:06 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
The current CHIP11 errata truncates the device tree memory node, and
subtracts
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 22:52 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 06:31 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:37:43 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 18:06 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
The current CHIP11
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:37:43 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 18:06 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
The current CHIP11 errata truncates the device tree memory node, and
subtracts
(hardcoded) 4096 bytes. This breaks kernels with larger PAGE_SIZE,
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 09:11 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Forget pages. The errata is about the last 256 bytes of physical
memory.
I still find it a bit tricky to have memory nodes not aligned on
nice
fat big boundaries tho.
I don't know what you're referring to. The patch I sent
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:44:56 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 09:11 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Forget pages. The errata is about the last 256 bytes of physical
memory.
I still find it a bit tricky to have memory nodes not aligned on
nice
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 06:06:46PM -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
The current CHIP11 errata truncates the device tree memory node, and subtracts
(hardcoded) 4096 bytes. This breaks kernels with larger PAGE_SIZE, since the
bootmem allocator assumes that total memory is a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 18:06 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
The current CHIP11 errata truncates the device tree memory node, and subtracts
(hardcoded) 4096 bytes. This breaks kernels with larger PAGE_SIZE, since the
bootmem allocator assumes that total memory is a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.
