On 27.02.2012, at 20:28, Scott Wood wrote:
On 02/24/2012 08:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
-void kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+int kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
unsigned long *pending = vcpu-arch.pending_exceptions;
unsigned long
On 02/28/2012 05:03 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.02.2012, at 20:28, Scott Wood wrote:
If there is a signal pending and MSR[WE] is set, we'll loop forever
without reaching this check.
Good point. How about something like this on top (will fold in later)?
diff --git
] KVM: PPC: booke: rework rescheduling checks
Instead of checking whether we should reschedule only when we exited due to an
interrupt, let's always check before entering the guest back again. This gets
the target more in line with the other archs.
Also while at it, generalize the whole thing
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 11:53 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org;
linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org;
Wood Scott-B07421
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/37] KVM: PPC: booke
On 02/24/2012 08:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
-void kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+int kvmppc_core_prepare_to_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
unsigned long *pending = vcpu-arch.pending_exceptions;
unsigned long old_pending = vcpu-arch.pending_exceptions;
@@
