On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 13:56 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hmm, unless smp_send_reschedule must be called with preemption disabled
(doesn't seem like an obvious requirement, even if callers commonly have
a reason to do so, and the only documentation of it I see is on the ia64
On 12/09/2011 05:15 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.12.2011, at 20:15, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/09/2011 01:10 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.12.2011, at 19:19, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 12/09/2011 09:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Our vcpu kick implementation differs a
Our vcpu kick implementation differs a bit from x86 which resulted in us not
disabling preemption during the kick. Get it a bit closer to what x86 does.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
On 09.12.2011, at 19:19, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 12/09/2011 09:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Our vcpu kick implementation differs a bit from x86 which resulted in us not
disabling preemption during the kick. Get it a bit closer to what x86 does.
Disabling preemption
On 12/09/2011 01:10 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.12.2011, at 19:19, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 12/09/2011 09:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Our vcpu kick implementation differs a bit from x86 which resulted in us not
disabling preemption during the kick. Get it a bit
On 09.12.2011, at 20:15, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/09/2011 01:10 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.12.2011, at 19:19, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 12/09/2011 09:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Our vcpu kick implementation differs a bit from x86 which resulted in us
not
