Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Eliminate double-copying of FP/VMX/VSX state

2013-09-09 Thread Alexander Graf
On 09.09.2013, at 11:38, Michael Neuling wrote: > Alexander Graf wrote: > >> >> On 09.09.2013, at 09:28, Michael Neuling wrote: >> At present, PR KVM and BookE KVM does multiple copies of FP and related state because of the way that they use the arrays in the thread_struct as a

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Eliminate double-copying of FP/VMX/VSX state

2013-09-09 Thread Michael Neuling
Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 09.09.2013, at 09:28, Michael Neuling wrote: > > >> At present, PR KVM and BookE KVM does multiple copies of FP and > >> related state because of the way that they use the arrays in the > >> thread_struct as an intermediate staging post for the state. They do > >>

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Eliminate double-copying of FP/VMX/VSX state

2013-09-09 Thread Alexander Graf
On 09.09.2013, at 09:28, Michael Neuling wrote: >> At present, PR KVM and BookE KVM does multiple copies of FP and >> related state because of the way that they use the arrays in the >> thread_struct as an intermediate staging post for the state. They do >> this so that they can use the existing

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Eliminate double-copying of FP/VMX/VSX state

2013-09-09 Thread Michael Neuling
> At present, PR KVM and BookE KVM does multiple copies of FP and > related state because of the way that they use the arrays in the > thread_struct as an intermediate staging post for the state. They do > this so that they can use the existing system functions for loading > and saving state, and

RE: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Eliminate double-copying of FP/VMX/VSX state

2013-08-08 Thread Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Mackerras [mailto:pau...@samba.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 3:08 PM > To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 > Cc: Alexander Graf; Benjamin Herrenschmidt; kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; > k...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Eliminate double-copying of FP/VMX/VSX state

2013-08-08 Thread Paul Mackerras
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:37:24AM +, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote: > > Nice work Paul! What do you suggest for KVM BookE AltiVec v2 patchset, > should I wait for this RFC or should I go ahead with the version based > on the existing infrastructure? It's really up to you and whether you

RE: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Eliminate double-copying of FP/VMX/VSX state

2013-08-07 Thread Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
bject: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Eliminate double-copying of FP/VMX/VSX state > > At present, PR KVM and BookE KVM does multiple copies of FP and > related state because of the way that they use the arrays in the > thread_struct as an intermediate staging post for the state. They do > this so t

[PATCH RFC 0/5] Eliminate double-copying of FP/VMX/VSX state

2013-08-06 Thread Paul Mackerras
At present, PR KVM and BookE KVM does multiple copies of FP and related state because of the way that they use the arrays in the thread_struct as an intermediate staging post for the state. They do this so that they can use the existing system functions for loading and saving state, and so that th