On 11/10/2010 12:21 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Indeed. Anyway, this wasn't intended (even more if some compiler
versions/settings dislike it).
Ok. I'll add the name and hope that this was the problem.
Interestingly, ia64 and powerpc fail the build for unrelated reasons.
--
error compiling comm
On 10.11.2010, at 11:21, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 12:18 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 10.11.2010 10:45, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> > On 11/10/2010 11:30 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> >> Am 10.11.2010 10:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> >>> On 11/09/2010 11:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 09.11.
On 11/10/2010 12:18 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Am 10.11.2010 10:45, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 11:30 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 10.11.2010 10:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2010 11:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.11.2010, at 17:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>IA64 support
On 11/09/2010 11:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.11.2010, at 17:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> IA64 support forces us to abstract the allocation of the kvm structure.
> But instead of mixing this up with arch-specific initialization and
> doing the same on destruction, split both steps. This allo
Am 10.11.2010 10:45, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 11:30 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 10.11.2010 10:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2010 11:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.11.2010, at 17:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> IA64 support forces us to abstract the allocation of the kvm
Am 10.11.2010 10:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 11:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 09.11.2010, at 17:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> IA64 support forces us to abstract the allocation of the kvm structure.
>>> But instead of mixing this up with arch-specific initialization and
>>> doing th
On 11/10/2010 11:30 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Am 10.11.2010 10:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 11:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 09.11.2010, at 17:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> IA64 support forces us to abstract the allocation of the kvm structure.
>>> But instead of mixing this up wit
On 09.11.2010, at 17:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> IA64 support forces us to abstract the allocation of the kvm structure.
> But instead of mixing this up with arch-specific initialization and
> doing the same on destruction, split both steps. This allows to move
> generic destruction calls into generi
IA64 support forces us to abstract the allocation of the kvm structure.
But instead of mixing this up with arch-specific initialization and
doing the same on destruction, split both steps. This allows to move
generic destruction calls into generic code.
It also fixes error clean-up on failures of