On 31.01.2014, at 23:17, Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:47:44AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 31.01.2014, at 11:38, Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 01/28/2014 05:44 PM, Aneesh Kumar
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 01/28/2014 05:44 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
We definitely don't need to emulate mtspr, because both the registers
are hypervisor resource.
This patch description doesn't cover what the patch actually does. It
changes the implementation from always
On 31.01.2014, at 11:38, Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 01/28/2014 05:44 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
We definitely don't need to emulate mtspr, because both the registers
are hypervisor resource.
This patch description
On 01/28/2014 05:44 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
We definitely don't need to emulate mtspr, because both the registers
are hypervisor resource.
This patch description doesn't cover what the patch actually does. It
changes the implementation from always tell the guest it uses 100% to
give the
We definitely don't need to emulate mtspr, because both the registers
are hypervisor resource.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h | 2 --
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
