Re: Keep index within boundaries in kvmppc_44x_emul_tlbwe()

2010-05-12 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:10:49AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 11.05.2010, at 00:58, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Roel Kluin wrote: > >> An index of KVM44x_GUEST_TLB_SIZE is already one too large. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin > > > > Acked-by: H

Re: Keep index within boundaries in kvmppc_44x_emul_tlbwe()

2010-05-10 Thread Alexander Graf
On 11.05.2010, at 00:58, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Roel Kluin wrote: >> An index of KVM44x_GUEST_TLB_SIZE is already one too large. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin > > Acked-by: Hollis Blanchard Acked-by: Alexander Graf Alex -- To unsubscribe from this li

Re: Keep index within boundaries in kvmppc_44x_emul_tlbwe()

2010-05-10 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Roel Kluin wrote: > An index of KVM44x_GUEST_TLB_SIZE is already one too large. > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin Acked-by: Hollis Blanchard Thanks Roel. -Hollis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to major

Re: Keep index within boundaries in kvmppc_44x_emul_tlbwe()

2010-05-09 Thread Alexander Graf
Roel Kluin wrote: > An index of KVM44x_GUEST_TLB_SIZE is already one too large. > Thanks for this one Roel. Please try to keep k...@vger CC'ed on KVM patches, as all KVM patches go through kvm.git. Hollis, I'd like to see an Ack from you on this patch. It looks reasonable to me, but I'd still

Keep index within boundaries in kvmppc_44x_emul_tlbwe()

2010-05-09 Thread Roel Kluin
An index of KVM44x_GUEST_TLB_SIZE is already one too large. Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin --- arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_tlb.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_tlb.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_tlb.c index 2570fcc..8123125 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/