On 04/11/2012 07:23 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 02:33:32PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/05/2012 08:02 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
I'll publish the new branches tomorrow, with any luck.
There wasn't any luck, so it's only ready today. To allow chance for
review, I'm publishi
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 02:33:32PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/05/2012 08:02 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > I'll publish the new branches tomorrow, with any luck.
>
> There wasn't any luck, so it's only ready today. To allow chance for
> review, I'm publishing next as next-candidate.
>
> Paul/Al
On 04/06/2012 03:02 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:02:44 +0300
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> > In a recent conversation, Linus persuaded me that it's time for change
> > in our git workflow; the following will bring it in line with the
> > current practices of most trees.
> >
> >
On 04/05/2012 08:02 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> I'll publish the new branches tomorrow, with any luck.
There wasn't any luck, so it's only ready today. To allow chance for
review, I'm publishing next as next-candidate.
Paul/Alex, please review the powerpc bits. Specifically:
system.h is gone, so
On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:02:44 +0300
Avi Kivity wrote:
> In a recent conversation, Linus persuaded me that it's time for change
> in our git workflow; the following will bring it in line with the
> current practices of most trees.
>
> The current 'master' branch will be abandoned (still available
In a recent conversation, Linus persuaded me that it's time for change
in our git workflow; the following will bring it in line with the
current practices of most trees.
The current 'master' branch will be abandoned (still available for
reviewing history). The new branch structure will be as foll
