On 08/16/2012 03:48 AM, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h index 3c14202..da71c84 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
/* Select powerpc specific features in
-
R65777
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: booke/bookehv: Add guest debug
support
+#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
+ PPC_LD(r7, VCPU_HOST_DBG+KVMPPC_DBG_IAC3, r4)
+ PPC_LD(r8, VCPU_HOST_DBG+KVMPPC_DBG_IAC4, r4)
+ mtspr SPRN_IAC3, r7
+ mtspr SPRN_IAC4, r8
+#endif
Can you handle
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h index 3c14202..da71c84 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
/* Select powerpc specific features in linux/kvm.h */ #define
__KVM_HAVE_SPAPR_TCE
: PPC: booke/bookehv: Add guest debug support
On 07/26/2012 12:32 AM, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
This patch adds:
1) KVM debug handler added for e500v2.
2) Guest debug by qemu gdb stub.
Does it make sense for these to both be in the same patch? If there's common
code used by both, that could
On 07/26/2012 12:32 AM, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
This patch adds:
1) KVM debug handler added for e500v2.
2) Guest debug by qemu gdb stub.
Does it make sense for these to both be in the same patch? If there's
common code used by both, that could be added first.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu
