On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 16:48 -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 12.09.2013, at 16:45, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 16:23 -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 12.09.2013, at 13:10, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 04:18 -0500, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> an
On 12.09.2013, at 16:45, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 16:23 -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 12.09.2013, at 13:10, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 04:18 -0500, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
and device disabling is not a standard like PCI. Do you think that we
>
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 16:23 -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 12.09.2013, at 13:10, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 04:18 -0500, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> >> and device disabling is not a standard like PCI. Do you think that we
> >> might need to do some
> >> device specific ha
7;kim.phill...@linaro.org'; kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; kvm-
>>> p...@vger.kernel.org; qemu-de...@nongnu.org
>>> Subject: Re: vfio for platform devices - 9/5/2012 - minutes
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 16:42 +, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
>>>&g
ethi Varun-B16395; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; 'Peter
> > Maydell'; 'Santosh Shukla'; 'Alexander Graf'; 'Antonios Motakis';
> > 'Christoffer
> > Dall'; 'kim.phill...@linaro.org'; kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; kvm-
> > p.
kla'; 'Alexander Graf'; 'Antonios Motakis'; 'Christoffer
> Dall'; 'kim.phill...@linaro.org'; kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; kvm-
> p...@vger.kernel.org; qemu-de...@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: vfio for platform devices - 9/5/2012 - minutes
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:51 PM
> To: Wood Scott-B07421; Sethi Varun-B16395; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; 'Peter
> Maydell'; 'Santosh Shukla'; 'Alex Williamson'; 'Alexander Graf';
> 'Antonios Motakis'; 'Christoffer Dall'; 'kim.phill
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 16:42 +, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:51 PM
> > To: Wood Scott-B07421; Sethi Varun-B16395; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; 'Peter
> > Maydell'; 'Santosh Shukla'; 'Alex Williamson
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 11:42 -0500, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
> One thing we didn't discuss needs to be considered (probably by
> Kim who is looking at the 'binding device' issue) is around
> returning a passthru device back to the host.
>
> After a platform device has been bound to vfio and is in
tonios Motakis'; 'Christoffer Dall'; 'kim.phill...@linaro.org';
> kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; qemu-
> de...@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: vfio for platform devices - 9/5/2012 - minutes
>
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:20:19PM +0100, Yoder Stu
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:20:19PM +0100, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
> Adding Will...
[...]
> > I have a query about the ARM SMMU driver. In the ARM smmu driver I see,
> > that bus notifiers are registered for both amba and platform bus. Amba is
> > the I/O interconnect, right? Why is bus notifie
der Graf';
> 'Antonios Motakis'; 'Christoffer Dall'; 'kim.phill...@linaro.org'
> Cc: kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; qemu-
> de...@nongnu.org
> Subject: RE: vfio for platform devices - 9/5/2012 - minutes
>
> I have a quer
I have a query about the ARM SMMU driver. In the ARM smmu driver I see, that
bus notifiers are registered for both amba and platform bus. Amba is the I/O
interconnect, right? Why is bus notifier required for the amba bus?
-Varun
> -Original Message-
> From: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> Sent:
13 matches
Mail list logo
