Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Decouple rmap_pde from lpage_info write_count

2012-01-24 Thread Avi Kivity
On 01/23/2012 12:42 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: The last one is an RFC patch: I think it is better to refactor the rmap things, if needed, before other architectures than x86 starts large pages support. Not commenting about the meat of the patches (not sufficiently recovered yet), but other

Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Decouple rmap_pde from lpage_info write_count

2012-01-24 Thread Takuya Yoshikawa
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:24:56 +0200 Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/23/2012 12:42 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: The last one is an RFC patch: I think it is better to refactor the rmap things, if needed, before other architectures than x86 starts large pages support. Not

[PATCH 0/4] KVM: Decouple rmap_pde from lpage_info write_count

2012-01-23 Thread Takuya Yoshikawa
The last one is an RFC patch: I think it is better to refactor the rmap things, if needed, before other architectures than x86 starts large pages support. Takuya arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c|8 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c |6 +++---

Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Decouple rmap_pde from lpage_info write_count

2012-01-23 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:42:04PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: The last one is an RFC patch: I think it is better to refactor the rmap things, if needed, before other architectures than x86 starts large pages support. Takuya Looks good to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: