On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 22:20 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:47:20 +0100 Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@
For KVM we need to allocate a new context id, but don't really care about
all the mm context around it.
So let's split the alloc and destroy functions for the context id, so we can
grab one without allocating an mm context.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
Hi Alexander,
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:47:20 +0100 Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@ extern void switch_slb(struct task_struct *tsk, struct
mm_struct *mm);
extern void
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 17:03 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
For KVM we need to allocate a new context id, but don't really care about
all the mm context around it.
So let's split the alloc and destroy functions for the context id, so we can
grab one without allocating an mm context.
No
For KVM we need to allocate a new context id, but don't really care about
all the mm context around it.
So let's split the alloc and destroy functions for the context id, so we can
grab one without allocating an mm context.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
For KVM we need to allocate a new context id, but don't really care about
all the mm context around it.
So let's split the alloc and destroy functions for the context id, so we can
grab one without allocating an mm context.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
