Hello!
> this respin tries to address all comments I got so far from the list.
> Thanks to Eric, Pavel and Christoffer for the review!
Tested-by: Pavel Fedin
Works fine.
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
__
Hello!
> But why would it need the capability to create models?
Actually it doesn't.
> The idea is to
> check the capability before the actual KVM_SIGNAL_MSI or
> KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING ioctl (and cache that result). I have a function
> with a static variable to do that, so it looks like:
>
> +
On 15/07/15 10:10, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf
>> Of Andre Przywara
>> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 5:22 PM
>> To: marc.zyng...@arm.com; christoffer.d...@linaro.org;
>> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
> -Original Message-
> From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf
> Of Andre Przywara
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 5:22 PM
> To: marc.zyng...@arm.com; christoffer.d..
Hello!
> >> + struct kvm_msi msi;
> >> +
> >> + msi.address_lo = e->msi.address_lo;
> >> + msi.address_hi = e->msi.address_hi;
> >> + msi.data = e->msi.data;
> >> + if (e->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI) {
> >> + msi.devid = e->devid;
> >> + msi.flags = KVM_MSI_VALID_
