On 26/07/15 13:50, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Hello!
>
>> As I said before, not having a VGIC pretty much puts you in an uncharted
>> territory, and the amount of hacks you have to introduce are not really
>> worth the effort in mainline.
>
> And i agreed. So, i repeat the question. Will it be OK if w
Hi all,
I have sent this mail last week, but It may be filtered to Spam, so I
send again.
Linaro has developed the foundation for the new Android Emulator code
base based on a fairly recent upstream QEMU code base, when we
re-based the code, we updated the device model to be more virtio based
(fo
Hello!
> > And i agreed. So, i repeat the question. Will it be OK if we just
> > enable KVM without both vGIC and vTimer, and that's all we do? It
> > will be userland's problem how to handle them. I need to tweak my
> > first patchset a very small bit in order to do this.
>
> I I'll repeat what
On 27/07/15 09:36, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Hello!
>
>>> And i agreed. So, i repeat the question. Will it be OK if we just
>>> enable KVM without both vGIC and vTimer, and that's all we do? It
>>> will be userland's problem how to handle them. I need to tweak my
>>> first patchset a very small bit in
