On 05/08/15 18:07, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2015-08-05 12:59 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/08/2015 18:48, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>> This fixes the error handling in the function vgic_v3_probe
>>> for when calling the function kvm_register_device_ops to check
>>> if the call to this functio
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:11:37PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 16/07/15 22:29, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> > This patch only saves and restores FP/SIMD registers on Guest access. To do
> > this cptr_el2 FP/SIMD trap is set on Guest entry and later checked on exit.
> > lmbench, hackbench show signif
On 06/08/2015 10:06, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > If this structure of function pointers can handle function pointers with a
> > return type of
> > void I will be glad to do what you request otherwise this would require a
> > major rewrite
> > of kvm arm subsystem for a very simple bug fix.
>
> Ju
Tested-by: Pavel Fedin
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.au...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 6:31 PM
> To: eric.au...@st.com; eric.au...@linaro.org;
> linux-arm-ker...@l
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:00:55PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 06/08/2015 10:06, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > If this structure of function pointers can handle function pointers with
> > > a return type of
> > > void I will be glad to do what you request otherwise this would require a
>
Hi Christoffer,
On 06/08/15 12:54, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:11:37PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 16/07/15 22:29, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>>> This patch only saves and restores FP/SIMD registers on Guest access. To do
>>> this cptr_el2 FP/SIMD trap is set on Guest entr
On 2015-08-06 08:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 06/08/2015 10:06, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> If this structure of function pointers can handle function pointers with a
>>> return type of
>>> void I will be glad to do what you request otherwise this would require a
>>> major rewrite
>>> of
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:19:14PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Having both VHE and non-VHE capable CPUs in the same system
> is likely to be a recipe for disaster.
>
> If the boot CPU has VHE, but a secondary is not, we won't be
> able to downgrade and run the kernel at EL1. Add CPU hotplug
> to
On 05/08/15 14:47, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:47:27PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> On 08/05/2015 12:53 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:44:09AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 05/08/15 08:32, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> On 08/04/2015
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:19:03PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Marc Zyngier (13):
> arm/arm64: Add new is_kernel_in_hyp_mode predicate
> arm64: Allow the arch timer to use the HYP timer
> arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN feature
> arm64: KVM: skip HYP setup when already running in HYP
>
On 2015-08-06 08:47 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-08-06 22:16 GMT+09:00 nick :
>>
>>
>> On 2015-08-06 08:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/08/2015 10:06, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> If this structure of function pointers can handle function pointers with
> a return type of
On 2015-08-06 09:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07.08.2015 10:31, nick wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2015-08-06 08:47 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> 2015-08-06 22:16 GMT+09:00 nick :
On 2015-08-06 08:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 06/08/2015 10:06, Marc Zyngier w
12 matches
Mail list logo
