On 13/01/16 09:16, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao
>
> Currently emulate_cp will return 0 (Handled) no matter what the accessor
> returns. If register accessor returns false, it will not skip current PC
> while emulate_cp return handled. Then guest will stuck in
From: Shannon Zhao
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index eec3598..4048934 100644
---
From: Shannon Zhao
The values of CPSR MODE mask are different between aarch32 and aarch64.
It should use the right one according to the execution state.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 8 ++--
1 file
From: Shannon Zhao
These bugs are found when I test the 32 bit part of guest PMU patch set.
Shannon Zhao (3):
KVM: ARM64: Fix wrong use of the CPSR MODE mask
KVM: ARM64: Fix comments of the CP handler
KVM: ARM64: Fix guest dead loop when register accessor returns
On 13/01/16 09:16, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao
>
> The values of CPSR MODE mask are different between aarch32 and aarch64.
> It should use the right one according to the execution state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
> ---
>
On 13/01/16 09:16, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
Wei Huang redhat.com> writes:
>
> Initial ACPI support for ARM64 has been accepted into Linux kernel
recently.
> Now it is a good time to re-visit ACPI support for KVM. This patchset
> enables ACPI for both arch_timer and vGIC by probing related ACPI
tables
> and does necessary
On 1/12/2016 4:57 PM, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>
>
> On 1/12/2016 6:12 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:39:21PM -0800, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/10/2016 8:32 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Hi Mario,
I spotted one more potential issue...
On 2016/1/13 17:31, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 13/01/16 09:16, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> From: Shannon Zhao
>>
>> The values of CPSR MODE mask are different between aarch32 and aarch64.
>> It should use the right one according to the execution state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 01:22:49PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Scan bus 0 and function 0 only for now
>
> Cc: Andrew Jones
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev
> ---
> arm/pci-test.c | 4 +++
> lib/pci-host-generic.c | 67
>
Marc Zyngier arm.com> writes:
> Good catch again, but I'd rather approach this in a way that is similar
> to the patch I posted last year, unifying some of the paths between
> the 32 and 64 accesses (the code paths are really pointlessly different).
>
> I have the below patch, fully untested.
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 01:22:48PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Cc: Andrew Jones
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev
> ---
> arm/pci-test.c | 25 +++
> config/config-arm-common.mak | 5 +-
> lib/alloc.c | 3 -
>
12 matches
Mail list logo