Hi Shih-Wei,
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 04:57:55PM -0500, Shih-Wei Li wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback about the mistakes in math and some issues in
> naming, print msg, and coding style. I'll be careful and try to avoid
> the same problems the next patch set. Sorry for all of the confusion.
>
> So
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:17:55AM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Shih-Wei,
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 04:57:55PM -0500, Shih-Wei Li wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback about the mistakes in math and some issues in
> > naming, print msg, and coding style. I'll be careful and try to avoid
> >
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:30:28AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:17:55AM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > Hi Shih-Wei,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 04:57:55PM -0500, Shih-Wei Li wrote:
> > > Thanks for the feedback about the mistakes in math and some issues in
> > >
Hi James,
Thanks for this mail.
> Hi gengdongjiu,
>
> On 23/01/18 09:06, gengdongjiu wrote:
> > On 2018/1/23 3:32, James Morse wrote:
> >>> it seems this "CONFIG_ARM64_RAS_EXTN" is not enabled in the
> >>> "arch/arm64/configs/defconfig", if not, I want to enable this config to
> >>> enable RA
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:07:20PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> So far this is just a copy of the legacy non-VHE switch function, but we
> will start reworking these functions in separate directions to work on
> VHE and non-VHE in the most optimal way in later patches.
I'd be concerned that no
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:07:21PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> VHE kernels run completely in EL2 and therefore don't have a notion of
> kernel and hyp addresses, they are all just kernel addresses. Therefore
> don't call kern_hyp_va() in the VHE switch function.
Isn't this an example of avoi
Hi James,
Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
>
> Hi Dongjiu Geng,
>
> On 06/01/18 16:02, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> > The ARM64 RAS SError Interrupt(SEI) syndrome value is specific to the
> > guest and user space needs a way to tell KVM this value. So we add a
> > new ioctl. Before user sp
Hi Christoffer,
In the previous patch, we did the avg and min/max altogether in a
single function, in which we can skip the test (and output msg to tell
the user about it) if its cost is smaller than 1 cnnfrq for more than
X times.
I think we can use two functions, one for "avg" and one for
"minx
