*** Apologies for multiple copies ***
C a l l F o r P a p e r s
Twenty-fourth European Symposium on Research in Computer Security (ESORICS
2019)
Luxembourg -- September 23-27, 2019
WWW:
On 01/12/2019 09:19 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 02:49:29PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> As far as I can see,
>>
>> #define GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ACCOUNT)
>>
>> So what's the difference between:
>>
>> (GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO) &
On 01/12/2019 10:18 PM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
>> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@
>> # error "Need more virtual address space for the ESPFIX hack"
>> #endif
>>
>> -#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
>> -
>> /* This contains
On 01/13/2019 11:05 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 12-01-19 15:56:38, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
>> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
>> code duplication which can be easily
